Compruébalo antes de confiar.
Las reseñas citan evidencia visible, señales públicas y controles editoriales. Las puntuaciones tienen fecha y pueden revisarse.
¿Sitio no listado?Solicitar informeMás recientesCars.comClaudeJunk KingMicrosoft Azure
Últimas reseñas
Sorted by most recently updated. Reviews cite visible evidence and remain revisable as sources change. Showing a category-balanced page so one vertical does not dominate the homepage.
| # | Entity | Review note | Score | Read review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Chegg | Chegg scores 93/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 93/100 | |
| 18 | Cars.com | Cars.com scores 58/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 58/100 | |
| 19 | Claude | Claude scores 73/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 73/100 | |
| 20 | Junk King | Junk King scores 62/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 62/100 | |
| 21 | Microsoft Azure | Microsoft Azure scores 93/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability… | 93/100 | |
| 22 | Dropbox | Dropbox scores 76/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 76/100 | |
| 23 | Farfetch | Farfetch scores 63/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 63/100 | |
| 24 | Oura | Oura scores 88/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 88/100 |
Recently reviewed in Business Software & SaaS
Ver todas →Recently reviewed in Shopping & Marketplaces
Ver todas →Explorar por categoría
Average reviewed score per sector across public profiles. Review scores stay evidence-led and revisable.
Cómo trabajamos
Every verdict is sourced, dated, and revisable. Editors can still mark a page as pending or needing review when a public status warning is intentional.
Metodología →- Public evidenceEvery claim cites a verifiable source a reader can inspect.
- Editorial gatekeepingInternal investigations stay out of the website until the record is sound.
- Honest uncertaintyWhere evidence is thin, we say so plainly on the page.
- Revised on signalReviews are updated as new evidence appears, not on a schedule.
From the editorial team
Methodology notes, essays, and field guides.
How TrustScan checks online projects
A practical overview of our review method, evidence standards, editorial controls, and how we prepare pages for search and answer engines.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026Editorial standardsWe don't take payment from reviewed companies. Reviews update when evidence appears, not on a schedule.
Read our methodologyHow to check if an online project is trustworthy
A practical checklist for reviewing a website before you share data, send money, or rely on its claims.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026review platforms · 3 min readTrustpilot alternatives for project reviews
What to look for when you need evidence-led project reviews instead of only star ratings.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026¿Necesitas comprobar un dominio?
Submit any website, exchange, or platform. We investigate against the reviewscorer methodology and usually send a detailed report within 6 hours.