Sjekk før du stoler på det.
Anmeldelser siterer synlige bevis, offentlige signaler og redaksjonelle kontroller. Scorer er datert og kan revideres.
Ikke oppført?Be om rapportSiste anmeldelser
Sorted by most recently updated. Reviews cite visible evidence and remain revisable as sources change. Showing a category-balanced page so one vertical does not dominate the homepage.
| # | Entity | Review note | Score | Read review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Chegg | Chegg scores 93/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 93/100 | |
| 18 | Cars.com | Cars.com scores 58/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 58/100 | |
| 19 | Claude | Claude scores 73/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 73/100 | |
| 20 | Junk King | Junk King scores 62/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 62/100 | |
| 21 | Microsoft Azure | Microsoft Azure scores 93/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability… | 93/100 | |
| 22 | Dropbox | Dropbox scores 76/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 76/100 | |
| 23 | Farfetch | Farfetch scores 63/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 63/100 | |
| 24 | Oura | Oura scores 88/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS… | 88/100 |
Bla etter kategori
Average reviewed score per sector across public profiles. Review scores stay evidence-led and revisable.
Slik jobber vi
Every verdict is sourced, dated, and revisable. Editors can still mark a page as pending or needing review when a public status warning is intentional.
Metode →- Public evidenceEvery claim cites a verifiable source a reader can inspect.
- Editorial gatekeepingInternal investigations stay out of the website until the record is sound.
- Honest uncertaintyWhere evidence is thin, we say so plainly on the page.
- Revised on signalReviews are updated as new evidence appears, not on a schedule.
From the editorial team
Methodology notes, essays, and field guides.
How TrustScan checks online projects
A practical overview of our review method, evidence standards, editorial controls, and how we prepare pages for search and answer engines.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026Editorial standardsWe don't take payment from reviewed companies. Reviews update when evidence appears, not on a schedule.
Read our methodologyHow to check if an online project is trustworthy
A practical checklist for reviewing a website before you share data, send money, or rely on its claims.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026review platforms · 3 min readTrustpilot alternatives for project reviews
What to look for when you need evidence-led project reviews instead of only star ratings.
By Editorial team · May 13, 2026Trenger du å sjekke et domene?
Submit any website, exchange, or platform. We investigate against the reviewscorer methodology and usually send a detailed report within 6 hours.