Skip to main content
507openbare reviewsWebsite-reviews op basis van bewijs

Controleer voordat je vertrouwt.

Reviews citeren zichtbaar bewijs, openbare signalen en redactionele controles. Scores zijn gedateerd en herzienbaar.

Site niet vermeld?Rapport aanvragen

RecenterSlackPipedrive

Laatste reviews

Sorted by most recently updated. Reviews cite visible evidence and remain revisable as sources change. Showing a category-balanced page so one vertical does not dominate the homepage.

#EntityReview noteScoreRead review
505
FigmaBusiness Software & SaaS · May 21, 2026
Figma scores 89/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS…
89/100
506
SlackBusiness Software & SaaS · May 21, 2026
Slack scores 94/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS…
94/100
507
PipedriveBusiness Software & SaaS · May 21, 2026
Pipedrive scores 77/100 from an automated website-signal review covering official-site availability, HTTPS…
77/100
Redactie

Hoe we werken

Every verdict is sourced, dated, and revisable. Editors can still mark a page as pending or needing review when a public status warning is intentional.

Methodologie
  1. Public evidenceEvery claim cites a verifiable source a reader can inspect.
  2. Editorial gatekeepingInternal investigations stay out of the website until the record is sound.
  3. Honest uncertaintyWhere evidence is thin, we say so plainly on the page.
  4. Revised on signalReviews are updated as new evidence appears, not on a schedule.
Vertrouwelijke rapporten

Domein laten controleren?

Submit any website, exchange, or platform. We investigate against the reviewscorer methodology and usually send a detailed report within 6 hours.

Rapport aanvragen